Posted on 06/14/2012 10:01:13 PM PDT by Perseverando
Just two, the model is wearing more make-up and the photographs could have been taken years apart, but if there are TWO models as you suggest, neither of them are Stanley Ann Dunham.
And with a little tidy-up around the neck, you could convince us that THE MODEL graduated from Mercer Island High School in 1960, just like they tried in this history link, in which Tony Nugent, who was Class of 1958, provided some BS and graphics.
Suggest you study the sources at the bottom of the article. Suggest you either wake up or get off my back.
http://www.historylink.org/index.cfm?DisplayPage=output.cfm&file_id=8897
btw, you may not be aware of it, but you are doing more than I ever could to expose the perps and their tactics. Thanks.
...you have done nothing but used a cloning tool to alter the face of SAD by superimposing THE MODEL’S mouth and nose etc onto her face.
You think freepers are stupid, don’t you?
I didn’t use the cloning tool to alter anything. Anyone can do this. Copy and paste one image on top of the other. Resize the pasted image, but hold down the shift key so it retains the same scale and doesn’t stretch or distort. Nudge the image till the eyes line up. It “snaps” right into place. Dude, it’s time to wake up. Your own images dispute your beliefs.
RE: Not so fast, my FRiend.
FMD is not 0b0z0’s father...more misinformation to achieve the following narrative: “It’s embarrassing to prove that 0b0z0 IS a NBC; however, he’s eligible to be president! So, shut up and move along...”
Sorry my FRiend, but there are no witnesses and no facts to back up the story that Barack Obama, the senior, is Barry’s daddy.
Biographer admits: There was no Obama family! - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2897205/posts
Here is a pertinent excerpt from the WND.com article by Jack Cashill with more at WND:
Despite his Herculean digging into the dung of Obamas life, Maraniss shovel comes up empty on the couples alleged February 1961 wedding. He footnotes his comments thusly: Marriage facts recorded in divorce records.
There is no doubt that both Ann Dunham and Obama claimed a wedding. It suited both their purposes, Obama to extend his visa and Dunham to legitimize her baby with a black husband.
As to the divorce, Dunham at the time was desperately trying to keep her future husband, Lolo Soetoro, in the country. The INS believed her to be married to Obama. Even if she were not married, a divorce would have been useful to clear the way for a marriage to Soetoro.
Like all other biographers of either Obama or his parents, Maraniss is totally silent on Dunhams whereabouts from the February marriage to the August birth. He adds one detail, however, that deepens the mystery.
According to the birth certificate and the newspaper announcements, the young family lived at 6085 Kalanianole Highway where Dunhams parents lived. Obama Sr. clarified to the INS that mother and baby lived there without him.
Maraniss definitively states that [Dunham] and Obama and the infant never lived [at 6085 Kalanianole]. There was no room. The senior Dunhams shared the house with the Pratt family. The Pratt daughter has no memory of the Dunhams daughter bringing an infant home.
I thank you for your detailed answer. I answered your post that seems to acknowledge that FMD is 0b0z0's father.
You wrote: Yep, with a radical, militant pervert communist father.
I said FMD is NOT 0b0z0's father and I did NOT say that BO Sr. is.
Actually, if you read the huge threads that are in progress for days, you'll see that SADO and BO Sr. are NOT his parents either!
I'm sure the truth will come out soon.
My post to you meant one thing and one thing only, 0b0z0id are trying to say to whoever wants to listen that 0b0z0 was born in HI and that it could be tough to admit that FMD is 0b0z0's father, SADO is his mother, hence; he's a NBC "anyway" but it's embarrassing to admit. Therefore, theyre trying to divert people from the truth and pushing them to move along.
I, and many others, don't buy that at all.
Thanks again.
edge919 - YOUR CREATION - SUPERIMPOSING STANLEY ANN DUNHAM'S FACE OVER THE FACE OF THE MODEL
AN INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS OF THE IMAGES:
I have taken the two heads and rotated them a few degrees clockwise to obtain a level line through the eyes and a vertical line bisecting the features.
The heads had been adjusted to present the same height: 6 cm.
The heads are then aligned so that a horizontal line touches their chins, and another, touches the tops of their heads.
With like sized heads on the same level the features (lips, nose, eyes) do NOT align.
A contrarian might say, "The angle is different," but if it's the same person, the same 6 cm image height, the angle ought to be the same.
I find the nostrils are dramatically different--and we know the profile of the noses are different--profile does NOT show up in frontal view.
I, too, find the EARS are vastly different: Model has tapered lobes, attached, and angling toward the head, while the HSG has separate and pendulous lobes of elephantine proportions, just what we would expect looking at her father Stanley Armour Dunham's gigantic ears.
I’d say that is quite definitive and not only puts to rest the “SAD was a porn model” myth but drives a stake into its heart and burns in in a funeral pyre.
The new “myth” is the fall back plan IMHO. Being trotted out now, perhaps because of Joe Arpiao’s posse and upcoming press conference.
However, when we do that same analysis with the images that I previously overlayed, we get a much different result:
Now, the alignment is much more similar. To get such alignment between the two images of "the model", then the left image has to be skewed and stretched. I didn't have to do any of that with the right image and the yearbook picture. Reasons for the differences in all these pictures can be accounted for by camera angle, focal length, facial expression, time of the month, etc. The other thing that hasn't been accounted for is that SAD's high school picture was most likely retouched, while the other images do not look like they were retouched.
The bottom line is that nothing here rules out the model (or the right model) from being the same woman as in the high school yearbook picture. All I know is that when I superimposed one image on top of the other and vice versa, the alignment was uncanny. If I could make an animated gif, I could really show well these images line up by sliding the opacity back and forth.
Thanks for the response, I knew you would find the analysis interesting, glad to be of help. Have a nice evening.
Yes, it’s too bad you didn’t help your own cause better, but at least you’re taking it well.
With the two women's heads vertical and the same size their differences are apparent.Had the photos been of the same woman, when aligned with facial features plumb and head heights evened all features would be in alignment.
That they are not indicates they are two individuals.
Other apparent individualities include the HSG's nostrils are asymmetrical; Model's nothing at all alike.
HSG's ears are large and pendulous, just as her father's; Model's ears nothing like this.
The HSG's face is slender, thin, while Model's is full, rounder.
There is a link to Frank Marshall Davis and it is that Stanley Armour Dunham was his associate, and Davis was Obama's mentor from ages 9 through 18.
fwiw: The model on the right looks like the sweater girl to me. As for SAD’s nostrils being different, if you look closely at that photo, it appears to have been messed with to MAKE her nostrils look different. iow, to distort her face to make it harder to identify her elsewhere. This seems to be a habit with nearly every photograph of SAD, but also, especially, the passport photos. In the sweater image, not only is her right nostril moved, but her upper lip is also misaligned. They may have split the image and put the two pieces back together, in order to slim her face and make her less identifiable.
I’m pissed off!!
“...swinging lifestyle in which he and his wife had sex numerous times with an underage girl named Anne, a figure very suggestive of Obamas mother.....”
A woman he describes as a 14 YO Jamacian......not an 18 YO white woman.....sigh.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.