BS I could be hit by someone changing a CD, yapping with somebody in the front seat, doing their makeup, you name it. This is just another nanny-state law that is not needed.
Yes you could.
Would that make you feel better, just knowing that someone died because of your inattention (regardless of what you were doing?)
Enjoy your life and may you never be responsible for someone’s death or injury because you are so self centered and don’t concern yourself with the safety not only of yourself but others in your vicinity.
I said NOTHING about outlawing anything.
I can’t, nor can anyone on this planet reduce risk to zero but we can take responsibility to help insure that we are not (or at least minimally) responsible for the death or injury of others by being actively aware of hazards instead of just willy nilly going about life with no consideration of others.
People who do not consider the safety of others and only think and act on their own pleasures, should be controlled, regulated or even placed in a padded room.
If one in unconcerned about anyone but themselves they are a danger to the general public and should be controlled until they grow up and adequately become responsible to humanity and other forms of life.
I pity those that feel no consideration to people (and other form of life or property) other then for their own selfish, self centered desires.
I AM NOT ADVERSE TO CHALLENGES AND RISK TAKING.
But taking and endangering others is adverse to my way of thinking. I will take risks on my own but NOT when it endangers others.
That is what makes the difference between a True Adventurer and a self centered, self serving, inconsiderate slob.
Is that to the point that you NOW understand my concern?