Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
"That there must be some remnant standing for God to forestall judgement when most of America stands guilty of voting against the morality of God."

Is it just now occurring to you that We The People should be voting for 'the morality of God'? Are you convinced that all your votes have been 'for the morality of God' in the past?

If I had to guess over which of the two who can be elected president is more likely to be effected by the prayers of We The People, I would guess it is Milt, but there is always the possibility that God will grab the heart of little barry bastard commie and turn him ... but it is less likely with a drug addled probable bi sexual than it is with a non-drug using, monogamous man. Would it be out of line to ask you to compare Obama and Romney to Jacob? ... Which twister is more like Jacob, Milt or Barry?

If one limited their vote to ONLY politicians completely 'in the morality of God', that person would probably never be voting. You have every right to vote as you please in America, thus far, but to try and stamp those who vote based upon the political perspectives as being 'outside of God's morality' is, at least to my opinion, a bit hypocritical --falling for a strategy of the accuser of the brethren-- since not one single politician now or later is likely to be standing only in 'God's morality'. Perhaps you know of one who is such a politician. In that case, please share that information.

835 posted on 06/15/2012 8:00:35 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 796 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN

You really need to read the prophets. Killing babies was the abomination, above all others, that brought judgement on Israel.

Both Mitt and Barry are unacceptable because of their track record of support for baby-killing and other abominations.

What they “might” become isn’t really the issue. The point isn’t to grow the right candidate while he’s in office. The point is to settle on a candidate being acceptable prior to assuming office.


838 posted on 06/15/2012 8:11:39 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 835 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN

If I may, I’d like to suggest you are half right. It is true that no one is perfect. Otherwise we would not need a Savior. However, there have been many good people in political life, and there still are, who do not and have never advanced, as a matter of public policy, legislative, executive, or judicial action in direct defiance to basic principles of divine law.

Unfortunately for Mitt, his history on abortion, gay marriage, even his recent pronouncements on gay adoption, are all indicators he is quite capable of brazenly assaulting God’s morality in his public policy decision-making.

Therefore, while I don’t find anyone perfect either, at least my conscience can find safe harbor in any number of dark horse choices who do respect divine law. I simply cannot put my stamp of approval on anyone who sets themselves up as a competitor to the one true God, either in public policy, or in religious belief, no matter if they promise me all the kingdoms of the earth in exchange for that approval.


840 posted on 06/15/2012 8:17:56 AM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 835 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson