To: MindBender26; SoConPubbie
Sorry, but everyone elase got it back at post 117 when I listed 59 reasons he gave to not vote for McCain. These were not my reasons or assumptions, they were a DIRECT 59 POINT QUOTE from his FR home page.
SoConPubbie listed reasons why conservatives should NOT vote for McCain. Once again you demonstrate a lack of comprehension, you opine that if one does not support McCain (or in this case Romney), they automatically support 0bama, which as I already pointed out to you, is a LIE.
But that makes a great deal of sense, considering that lies and flip-flops are all part of Romney's stock in trade, and you're emulating him exceptionally well.
Since most FReepers do their civic duty and vote, and the only two electable candidates were Mr. McCain and Mr. Obama, who do you think he was advocating for, Jabba the Hut? Felix the Cat? My Mother The Car?
I had no idea that you had family members seeking elective office.
554 posted on
06/14/2012 2:02:39 PM PDT by
mkjessup
(Romney is to conservatism what Helen Thomas is to a high fashion model walkway.)
To: mkjessup; MindBender26
considering that lies and flip-flops are all part of Romney's stock in trade, Exactly! And did you notice how easily he can bend people's minds? They are like clay in his hands. Evil are experts at that and they prey on the WEAK!
To: mkjessup; MindBender26
SoConPubbie listed reasons why conservatives should NOT vote for McCain. Once again you demonstrate a lack of comprehension, you opine that if one does not support McCain (or in this case Romney), they automatically support 0bama, which as I already pointed out to you, is a LIE.
mkjessup,
MindBender26 is both ABO and POP (Party over Principle) and as such, he/she does not have a problem lying about others as he has about my motives on this thread. This is standard stock and trade for those suffering from POP.
Ignore the evidence of Progressive Liberalism in both McCain and Romney's record because they are Republican. They will accuse you and I of being DU members, Obama supporters
They lack any true adherence to conservative principles.
They truly are Party over Principle types.
572 posted on
06/14/2012 2:32:47 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson