You left out "internal narrative." It is only on that basis that Romney can be called a "liberal." This supposition has been convincingly refuted (to my mind) by MindBender26 and Agamemnon — evidently two highly experienced "public men."
The term "public man" invokes the ancient philosopher Heraclitus. By this term, he referred to mature experienced men active in the service of their society who, above all, understand that the Logos "is one and common" to all men, whether they are consciously aware of this fact or not. Those who are unaware he referred to as "private men," men "asleep" and "dreaming"....
Well, just a bit of trivia here....
I would call such men "political realists." Not ideologues (i.e., "dreamers.")
My thanks go out to MindBender26 and Agamemnon for their outstandingly informative and responsive essay/posts on this issue.
Ok, if you beleive stating endorsements and personal opinion is evidence but links to actual documents, videos, news stories and Romney’s own words is not evidence, there is nothing more I can say.
Good day.
Betty,
It all boils down to two things.
Cain endorses Romney
Santorum endorses Romney
Newt endorses Romney
Ms Bauchmann endorses Romney... but these folks think they know better.
In addition, the reality is; Obama or Romney.
Thank you for having the wisdon to see that.
Be well.
Betty,
It all boils down to two things.
Cain endorses Romney
Santorum endorses Romney
Newt endorses Romney
Ms Bauchmann endorses Romney... but these folks think they know better.
In addition, the reality is; Obama or Romney.
Thank you for having the wisdon to see that.
Be well.