Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rubio to help Obama on confirmation
The Hill ^ | 13 June 2012 | Julian Pecquet

Posted on 06/13/2012 9:47:58 AM PDT by Theoria

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: Theoria

I’m tired of Marco already.


41 posted on 06/13/2012 11:13:00 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
“Marco Rubio was not naturalized and had no need of naturalization because he was born a citizen of these United States.”

RIGHT, to be a “CITIZEN”. Natural born citizen, is another matter. About that YOU ARE WRONG! Original Intent AND the Supreme Court agree that to be an Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, Natural Born Citizen, you have to be born in the country AND BOTH parents had to be citizens. It couldn't be any clearer.

Did you not see the long article a few days ago?

42 posted on 06/13/2012 11:16:31 AM PDT by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

“Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) is vowing to break with conservatives”

What other vows of conservatism is he willing to break?


43 posted on 06/13/2012 11:18:46 AM PDT by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Rubio was born in the US and meets all other legitimate qualifications.

Both of his parents were US Citizens when he was born?

44 posted on 06/13/2012 11:20:21 AM PDT by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: nonsporting

Nowhere in the constitution is mom and dad mentioned. Anywhere.


45 posted on 06/13/2012 11:27:32 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Nowhere in the constitution is mom and dad mentioned. Anywhere.

Don't be a rube. The constitution doesn't define hardly any of its terms.

46 posted on 06/13/2012 11:34:15 AM PDT by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: liberalh8ter

Yep, and so would Jeb.


47 posted on 06/13/2012 11:46:30 AM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (Criminaliens or Crimigrants...0bamao's people?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: faucetman
According to the law most founders were familiar with and/or trained in; English law - one was natural born if they were born into that condition of allegiance.

According to the first naturalization law of 1790, while the founders were still extant and in service to this nation - the children of citizens born overseas were natural born and thus in no need of naturalization. How is that for original intent?

Vattel never used the term “natural born citizen” - but he figured the indigenous or native citizens should be those born of citizens and in country (with a few exceptions) - and all others would have to be naturalized.

In all cases one is either natural born or one must be naturalized.

According to our Constitution and U.S. law; one is either natural born or naturalized.

There is no third type of citizenship currently. There was, and it was those who were citizens at the time of the adoption of the Constitution. Most of these were born as natural born subjects of England - and they did not have to be born in England of two citizen parents to be natural born subjects of England. They simply had to be born as subjects of England to be natural born subjects of England - and they were.

48 posted on 06/13/2012 11:53:19 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

He’s “growing in office” and is “learning to play ball” all the while “reaching across the aisle” .....its the metamorphosis of a Conservative to a Rino....the final coup comes when he starts collecting “campaign donations” to his “re-election (oops..”retirement”) fund in return for his “bipartisanship”;

At that point he no longer is free to vote the Conservative/Constitutional ticket on behalf of We the People.He is then owned.


49 posted on 06/13/2012 12:03:13 PM PDT by mo (If you understand, no explanation is needed. If you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theoria
Marco Rubio

born May 28, 1971 in Miami, FL (Meets the Jus Soli Requirement)

Parents were
Mario Rubio born in Cuba, naturalized Nov. 5, 1975.
Oria Garcia born in Cuba, naturalized Nov. 5, 1975.

Parents were NOT US Citizens at the time of his birth (Does NOT meet the Jus Sanguinis Requirement)

Marco Rubio is NOT a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.

Marco's status is the same as that of Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Hussein Obama, who is NOT a Natural Born Citizen.

50 posted on 06/13/2012 12:05:53 PM PDT by ASA Vet (Natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. De Vattel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nonsporting

You birthers make me laugh.

Have you checked under your bed for a boogieman ?


51 posted on 06/13/2012 12:22:31 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker; Ingtar; Rome2000
Who is he trying to appeal to?

Our enemies.
Mitt Romney.
La Raza.

Bingo!

To everyone but conservatives.

52 posted on 06/13/2012 12:29:59 PM PDT by Jane Long (Soli Deo Gloria!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

You pro-Rubio folks were warned a long time ago.


53 posted on 06/13/2012 12:30:28 PM PDT by GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks; nonsporting

Rubio’s parents were not citizens when he was born. He is not a NBC.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2840767/posts?page=90#90

The Constitutional Meaning Of “Natural Born Citizen”
Vanity Essay | 31 January 2012 | sourcery

This says it better than any other one source that I know of on FR.


54 posted on 06/13/2012 12:30:51 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

And Romney’s were born in the US ?

Quit chasing your tail.


55 posted on 06/13/2012 12:36:44 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: jrg

LOL, is there some story behind ‘bistec de palomilla’ steak of moth?


56 posted on 06/13/2012 12:55:03 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Republicanism: Y1 Rant Y2 Rant Y3 Rant Y4, Oh nevermind, vote for him anyway. Rinse & Repeat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: newfreep

Perhaps so. I had high hopes for him a few years back.


57 posted on 06/13/2012 12:56:01 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Republicanism: Y1 Rant Y2 Rant Y3 Rant Y4, Oh nevermind, vote for him anyway. Rinse & Repeat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Freestate316

I agree with your thoughts here. Rush used to talk about the futility of compromising with Liberals. You can’t compromise with someone when you are supporting sound policy, and they are supporting totalitarianism or anarchy. If you move one inch off sound policy, it’s a loss.

Yes, we always have our McCains, Grahams, Snows... when the Dems come calling. One Republican in the Senate that votes with the Democrats, has a louder voice than the 45 who didn’t.

I’m sick of that.


58 posted on 06/13/2012 1:01:18 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Republicanism: Y1 Rant Y2 Rant Y3 Rant Y4, Oh nevermind, vote for him anyway. Rinse & Repeat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Parents don’t have to be born in the US, just citizens. I’ve read there is some doubt about Romney’s father, I have no idea.

Your nastiness and leftist garbage talking points are duly noted.


59 posted on 06/13/2012 1:01:30 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

Perhaps you had better vision than me, but some of his most early and visible actions seemed sound to me.


60 posted on 06/13/2012 1:02:42 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Republicanism: Y1 Rant Y2 Rant Y3 Rant Y4, Oh nevermind, vote for him anyway. Rinse & Repeat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson