Posted on 06/12/2012 1:37:18 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
The Florida State Attorney's office has announced the wife of George Zimmerman - the defendant in the shooting death of Trayvon Martin - has been arrested on suspicion of perjury.
Her husband stands accused of second-degree murder after shooting the unarmed black teenager Trayvon Martin dead, in what he says was self-defence, after claiming he had been attacked.
I don’t listen to anyone’s explanations. I pay attention to facts only. Fact is that I believe and always have that George Zimmerman is innocent and should be set free. I wanted to believe when this was first reported, that Shellie was being railroaded and she probably is, but again I waited for the facts and I see that it is a fact that she knew about and had transferred a lot of money prior to the bond hearing. She stated at the bond hearing that they had no money and were trying to scrape things together between family members. To question this, does not make me lost or owned.
In bringing a motion to have Zimmerman's bond revoked lead prosecutor Bernie De la Rionda complained "This court was led to believe they didn't have a single penny. It was misleading and I don't know what words to use other than it was a blatant lie." The judge agreed . . .
Bernie's statement here is a blatant lie. She never said that they didn't have a single penny. They already had the tapes of their prison conversation at this hearing and knew that they had some money.
Anyway just what in hell's name are they doing setting bailbond at $150,000 for a defendant who they were misled to believe did not have a single penny. How did they expect him to meet bail with him being penniless???
Reading your posts, I am convinced you have some kind of hidden agenda here.
<><><><
OK. Whatever that means. I’ll simply ask if you’ve read the probable cause affidavit that led to her arrest.
Here it is if you haven’t and are interested.
http://www.kmsstv.com/files/kmsstv/Shellie%20Zimmerman%20Arrest%206-12-12.pdf
8 cash transaction under the 10K reporting limit in the few days leading up the bond hearing, along with the other transactions and her statements to the court - if true as alleged - renders her testimony disingenuous at best.
Show us the exact quotes that substantiate what you have stated. If not, then you should retract what you have stated.
<><><><
Sorry, the best I have at the present moment is the probable cause affidavit.
http://www.kmsstv.com/files/kmsstv/Shellie%20Zimmerman%20Arrest%206-12-12.pdf
Since she transferred - according the affidavit - more than 100K in the days leading up to the bond hearing, I don’t think I have anything to retract. Do you read the affidavit differently?
I’m not going to try to defend dmz, but I do have to question the fact that the affidavit states that she transferred over $74,000.00 from George’s account to hers
<><><><
Why would you not defend me? We’re saying the same thing.
But I see dragnet2 has already declared you lost, because you are not dismissing the entire arrest affidavit out of hand.
But I see dragnet2 has already declared you lost
<><><><><<>
whoops, accusing you of something you didn’t do.
BTW, how do ya kick back like that when your fighting for your life, from corrupt government courts with political agendas and people like prosecutors like Corey?
Ya think they might be concerned while enjoying margaritas on the veranda, about politically motivated prosecutors and black racist gangs putting death bounties on their heads?
Once again, reading your posts and the wording used, I am convinced you have some kind of hidden agenda here.
Bull sh*t, that is not what you "simply" commented about.
You've got Zim and his wife relaxing having a great time, sipping margaritas on the veranda, if only these two "love birds" as you say, had not lied to the courts, who you've implied or suggested are totally unbiased and fair in this case.
Gak!
Once again, reading your posts and the wording used, I am convinced you have some kind of hidden agenda here.
<><><><
I’m actually glad you raised this issue again by posting the exact same thing you posted last night. In doing so, I note that you chose not to respond in any fashion to the information contained in the arrest affidavit. Not a peep about the substantive portion of our discussion (you know, the facts), but instead choose to focus on what you think my motivations might be.
Let me put it to you this way ... this is an anonymous internet forum and the idea that there can exist meaningful hidden agendas on an anonymous internet forum is just absurd. Sorry, but there I said it.
What is being hidden? Who is it being hidden from? What can I expect to accomplish with a hidden agenda on an anonymous internet forum? One word answers for each of the 3 questions above. Nothing, nothing and nothing.
All my posts from the last 10 and a half years are archived and available for your reading pleasure. Have at it.
Or you could just read and respond to the substantive portion - which is right now the affidavit, and what Shellie knew and when. Any interest in that?
You’ve got Zim and his wife relaxing having a great time, sipping margaritas on the veranda,
<><><
You completely missed my meaning on that one. I meant only that neither of them would be in jail, and they could be together.
sorry, when I’m with my wife in Florida, we enjoy adult beverages sitting outside - ok you got me - not on the veranda but in the lanai.
Will you ever reference the substantive portion - you know the facts?
BTW, how do ya kick back like that when your fighting for your life, from corrupt government courts with political agendas and people like prosecutors like Corey??
Ya think they might be concerned while enjoying margaritas on the veranda, about politically motivated prosecutors and black racist gangs putting death bounties on their heads??
Once again, reading your posts and the wording used, I am convinced you have some kind of hidden agenda here.
I’ll simply ask if you’ve read the probable cause affidavit that led to her arrest.
Bull sh*t, that is not what you "simply" commented about.
You've got Zim and his wife relaxing having a great time, sipping margaritas on the veranda, if only these two "love birds" as you say, had not lied to the courts, who you've implied or suggested are totally unbiased and fair in this case.
I note that you chose not to respond in any fashion to the information contained in the arrest affidavit.
I noted you totally, repeatedly evaded my responses and questions to you.
Bull cheet
Read the thread, I only commented on *your* comments and responded to the wording you used.
Lets cut to the chase, shall we?
Has this been a politically motivated government sham from the beginning. Yes or no?
Has Zim has been a target of corrupt politically motivated, biased, over zealous, grandstanding government prosecutors? Yes or no?
If ya answered yes, then it totally impeaches the government down in Florida, and everything that follows, is part of this corrupt ugly political sham.
Well?
<><><><>
I'll be happy to answer your questions, even though they are entirely unrelated to the substantive issue (the facts as outlined in the affidavit).
So onto your first question:
BTW, how do ya kick back like that when your fighting for your life, from corrupt government courts with political agendas and people like prosecutors like Corey??
You don't. Their life is a living hell. This portion of their living hell appears - according to the affidavit - to be self inflicted.
Your second question:
Ya think they might be concerned while enjoying margaritas on the veranda, about politically motivated prosecutors and black racist gangs putting death bounties on their heads??
Again, their life is a living hell. I wouldn't even wish it on you - that's a joke btw - frankly I might have availed myself of that passport and gotten the hell out of dodge. Screw perceptions.
I also found this question in one your posts:
These two love birds? Were lying?
I'm going to kick this one back to you. Read the affidavit and then you tell me.
Read the thread, I only commented on *your* comments and responded to the wording you used.
Lets cut to the chase, shall we?
Has this been a politically motivated government sham from the beginning. Yes or no?
Has Zim has been a target of corrupt politically motivated, biased, over zealous, grandstanding government prosecutors? Yes or no?
If ya answered yes, then it totally impeaches the government down in Florida, and everything that follows, is part of this corrupt ugly political sham.
ANSWER THE QUESTIONS
Where’d ya go?
Yes or no?
Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit
Where’d ya go?
<><><><
Ummm, ate some lunch if that’s OK with you.
Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit
<><><><
Tools you are not terribly skilled at using.
Have you read the affidavit yet? Do you intend to? Will you respond after having done so?
See how that diversion and evasion thing works?
As far as your screaming “ANSWER THE QUESTIONS” goes, I don’t live in the same binary world as you do, where every question has a simple yes or no. Certainly elements of what you suggest by your questions exist, but they do not tell the whole story. And they certainly don’t exempt one from telling the truth to the judge.
You know, I believe I have now addressed each and every question you have posed. Does that make it your turn now?
Has this been a politically motivated government sham from the beginning. Yes or no?
Has Zim has been a target of corrupt politically motivated, biased, over zealous, grandstanding government prosecutors? Yes or no?
If ya answered yes, then it totally impeaches the government's credibility down in Florida, and everything that follows, is part of this corrupt ugly political sham.
This is the second or third time you've been asked and evaded these legitimate questions.
Why are you evading these questions?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.