“Please provide proof (such as a neutral witness statement) that Martin attacked Zimmerman.
Zimmerman’s injuries prove only that he can’t fight (but he sure can scream).They do not prove who started the fight at all”
I could say the most reasonable supposition from the evidence, including Zimmerman’s version, the medical reports, and eye witness testimony, is that Martin attacked Zimmerman. And it’s not so easy as you think to brush it off as Zimmerman being a bad fighter. He would have had to start the fight and not only lose but also not land a single blow, besides the one from his gun. That is incredible.
My supposition is not proof, but of course you don’t need proof to declare something on the internet. Luckily, the defense does not have to prove Martin started it in court, either, as the burden is on the prosecution.
Tublecane FTW!
wtc411 for the FAIL!