Very interesting, thank you.
I tend to agree with you-—I doubt Beck ever saw your article, unfortunately.
To fully comprehend the deceptions one would need to have an in-depth understanding of the history of the Decalogue Stones and the language nuances associated with them. The speaker deceives the young minds by inferring the writing is 'pre-Columbian' and the mound pre-historic. The actual facts of where the stones were found in proximaty to the mound is another purposed falsifying of the data.