You obviously misunderstand the ruling. You should note, however, that no one else does. No state. No member of Congress. No state DA, or Secretary of State. In short, no one with any responsibility misunderstands.
Only you, and a handful of illiterate birthers.
No, I do not. It is YOU who clearly does not understand the WKA ruling. Here it is...
"The evident intention, and the necessary effect, of the submission of this case to the decision of the court upon the facts agreed by the parties were to present for determination the single question stated at the beginning of this opinion, namely, whether a child born in the United States, of parent of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicil and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China, becomes at the time of his birth a citizen of the United States. For the reasons above stated, this court is of opinion that the question must be answered in the affirmative."WKA was found A CITIZEN only, NOT a natural born citizen. WKA did not meet the requirements of natural-born citizens defined in Minor v. Happersett (which WKA specifically cites), so SCOTUS had to interpret the 14th Amendment to grant WKA US citizenship.
Furthermore, SCOTUS specifically ruled WKA a citizen because his parents were permanently domiciled in the US. Obama's father was never domiciled in the US. He was always a foreign student, and did not remain in the country. Hence, Obama's direct allegiance to and his subjection to the jurisdiction of (see the US State Department's publication on Dual Nationality) a foreign country at birth, as explicitly stated by the DNC in the 2008 campaign.
Obama is NOT a natural born citizen.