Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
No. Your mistake is in thinking you can be an originalist while ignoring the original principles and all of the original stated purposes of the Constitution and the republic.

I understood them to create a republic, with a national government of limited and enumerated powers and all unenumerated powers reserved to the States, having decided that this was the best way to attain their stated objectives.

Do you submit that the did something different?

315 posted on 06/16/2012 6:18:08 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic; daisy mae for the usa; EternalVigilance; BlackElk; joanie-f; Steve Schulin; Gelato; ..
Like most folks in your camp, you apparently don't have the ability to discern the difference between legitimate powers and illegitimate powers, or between powers and rights.

You ignore the most important moral natural law principles that comprise the cornerstone of our republic and our claim to liberty.

And you choose to consistently ignore the sacred duties that of necessity go along with all powers and rights.

316 posted on 06/16/2012 6:30:47 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (To be added to the new EternalVigilance ping list, FReepmail me. www.TomHoefling.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson