No they aren't, creating abortion and homosexual marriage and homosexual adoption is not constitutional, it is just the wildly left weirdos coming at conservative America with a new vocabulary.
Libertarians know as much about the constitution as Fred Phelps knows about the Bible.
wow....just wow..
the lack of intellegence toward libertarians on this site is just amazing..
I am a small l libertarian, which means i lean farther to the right than conservative..
not all libertarians are nut jobs, just like all republicans are not conservatives...
I do not buy into abortion ( that is why i will not vote for romney )..
I beleive there should be no restrictions on possession of firearms ( that is why i will not vote for romney )....
I beleive in smaller government and less governmental interference in my life ( that is why i will not vote for romney )....
I beleive in lower taxes and less spending ( that is why i will not vote for romney )...
this site has been infiltrated, not by libs, but by republicans..
we here are hard core conservatives, aome of us with libertarian leanings..
the only person I know of that created homo adoptions and abortion on demand is.... romney..
who are the real conservatives here?
not anyone that backs romney..
If I am forced to choose between a baby killing, gay marriage advocate, gun grabbing, big government tax and spend socialist, or a constitutionalist that promotes isolationism, I can deal with 4 years of isolationism.
I cannot deal with 4 years of watching the conservative movement die, and die it will, if romney gets into the white house..
I am the 15%
The libertarian PHILOSOPHY is strictly constitutional - however, that gets bent out of shape in the instances you pose.
True libertarianism says:
True libertarians are passionate about protecting, on behalf of others, the rights they claim for themselves. One of the few legitimate roles of government is the protection of the weak from murderous attack by the strong. And no libertarian espouses the idea that government should not prohibit their own murder. An unborn child is one of the weakest, and thereby entitled to legitimate protection by the government. Any libertarian that advocates protection of their own lives and rights, but promotes the “legal” killing of unborn babies, is simply a hypocrite - claiming government protection for themselves that they are unwilling to grant the most helpless among us.
Libertarians can support the defense of marriage with this approach - any homosexual if free to marry a member of the opposite sex...just like anybody else - as long as they can find a willing partner...just like anybody else.
Adoptions - first preference, for the good of the child, is a home with a mother and a father, all other factors being equal or nearly equal. As much as I dislike the idea of gay couples adopting, I concede that a child is probably better off in a “loving” stable environment than in a series of foster homes or worse.