[tacticalogic]

All I've done is argue that the definition of "person" in the Constittuion has not historically been applied in the manner you say it should be.

Now you're telling me it's a violation of the Ninth Amendment to make that argument.

[EternalVigilance]

It is a violation of the Ninth Amendment to strip away the unalienable rights of the people based on some conclusion that the Constitution doesn’t specifically address those rights. Why is that so hard to understand?