I have been saying that myself through this entire “Arab Spring” garbage.
The choices were between corrupt bloodthirsty secular dictators and corrupt, bloodthirsty, Al Qaeda affilliated Islamic “Republics.” All things considered, we should have either supported the dictator, or supported the weaker side and prolonged the fighting until the entire country collapsed completely into civil disorder. When Moslems kill Moslems in large quantities, usually the whole world benefits.
Choices are clear.
Back in 1978/1979, regarding Iran, many Americans made the same noises about the Shah. Oooo, he was supposedly killing people in Iran - many faked pictures were to prove it too, at the time. What if he truly ordered killing of people? He Didn't, TRUE.
Had he done so, many (Khomeini supporters back then) would've not lived - including the ones who took American Embassy hostages.
Anyhow, People bought it - then came Khomeini, and then the same people shut the F up & simply watched, and keep on watching... Nobody asks how many people Khomeini et al has been killing since.
Now, Assad.. he is killing people, don't ya know? Sad, but true... yet, we harp on on the same that we brought on to the scene (a la Khomeini in Iran), muzzie brotherhood in Syria to be. And, no mistakes about it, it will be a moslem "brotherhood" in Syria, once Assad is gone.
Point is: the same emotional, ignorant people who blamed the Shah, harp on about Assad in Syria. The Shah, contrary to the popular, belief did not kill even a tiny fraction of what the Mullahs' regime has done in just over 30 yrs of its horror in Iran (and abroad). But, some Americans are still wondering...
When America selects, ehemm, elects a President who is more intelligent than Obama Hussein (a Moslem, is he?), then we can talk... "intelligently" about USA foreign Policy.
And, about "moslems killing moslems", we should worry about that more in your neck of the woods... apparently too many moslems in America already, AND they aint looking to kill each other.