[kevao]

I don’t think you’re looking at it correctly:

- If you cast one vote for Romney, Obama needs two votes to win.

- If you stay home, Obama needs only one vote to win.

Of course, if you live in NY or CA, it won’t matter a bit whom you vote for. But in other states where it can be close (say, Florida in 2000), to say a non-vote for Romney does not help Obama, is not correct.

[MHGinTN]

Let me try to splain it. If you cast a vote for Romeny in opposition to Obama, Obama needs one legitmate vote and one fraudulent vote to give himself a plus one vote. If you vote for Virgil good and not Romney and not Obama, both Romney and Obama need a vote in their favor to have one vote in their favor, but that only equals the vote cast for someone else. Voting for someone besides Romney or Obama still leaves Romney or Obama needing a vote.

The goal ought to be to get enough votes for Romney that Obama does not have more. Deriding fellow freepers for not voting for Romney and not voting for Obama isn't adding any votes to Romney's totals, but such dissonance among conservatives may in fact be suppressing the voter turnout, which tends to favor the democrat candidate because the democrats have so many fraudulent votes they can already count on.

Of course all of this discussion may be moot since a Soros owned compnay in Spain will be counting our votes. Stalin may be getting an 'attaboy' in the midst of his screaming torments.