Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TXnMA

And what of you? Any further comments or are you satisfied?


53 posted on 06/07/2012 7:54:05 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: philman_36; Flotsam_Jetsome; Red Steel
I'm quite satisfied. Since you brought up the subject, I really expected a direct answer from you on the order of, "No! Check my posting history for confirmation." -- and that definitely would have sufficed.

I'm in the camp that holds that the Founders intended to specify Presidents WITHOUT divided loyalties and/or NOT under foreign influence -- hence the "NBC" stipulation in Article II -- and that "NBC" means "offspring of two citizens".

Øbozo, of course is a prime example of violation of all of the above. IMHO, he has always known that he was ineligible, and that he -- with the knowing collusion of many like Nanzi Pelousie -- set out perpetrate the biigggest [stet] scam in the history of our Nation. My guess is that he is still somewhat surprised that he did succeed, and that explains his rush to do the maximum damage before he is caught and dragged from the office.

Although the investigation is interesting, I have always maintained that the BC was intended as misdirection to keep his inescapably guaranteed ineligibility -- and the massive FRAUD that he and his enablers have perpetrated -- behind a screen of "smoke & mirrors".

My guess is that he will be caught out on "high crimes and misdemeanor" charges of fully-proven FRAUD, long before (if ever) the second order question of his birthplace is settled.

~~~~~~~~~~

I find that most of the FReepers in the class you mentioned, exhibit a supercilious, lecturing, even sneering tone that is typical of the "FedShills" that we have nailed here in the past. I thought I detected a small whiff of that style in your #16 -- hence the request for clarification...

I would apologize, but clarity is a rare commodity with this medium -- even with the aid of HTML markup. So, I offer no excuses for seeking clarification.

Besides -- how else could one have precipitated an amusing discourse on "Pugnacity ...the antithesis of pusillaNiMity"? <LOL!!!>

Peace, FRiends! I would have been quite happy with,

"No."...

'-)

63 posted on 06/08/2012 7:28:26 AM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson