I don't think that you can reasonably claim this, as well as recognize that their actual suspect wasn't in the home and hadn't been for a year. There is something definitely defective in their process. I think it is that they simply don't care who gets hurt. This will eventually backfire badly for them, I think.
I wasn’t referring to the target aquisition process just simply the tactical enrty plan as executed by the on-site personnel......
Regardless of the flawed intelligence gathering prior to the onsite targeting, the tactical entry would be fast agressive and potentially lethal to anyone or thing within the home....
My post was in response to the stereotypical “beat of the chest” post we always see...
Re-read my post in that context and you will see that I was spot on with my assessment....
Yes, good catch. They can’t be carefully assessing each situation tactically and still hitting the wrong houses with this degree of regularity.
The way to solve these is to maintain the same standard to “raids” that we do to criminal procedure - beyond a reasonable doubt. Then when these guys get it wrong the source must be held accountable and made public. Do that once or twice and the crack head who gives info in exchange for fix money will think twice.