Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Partisan Gunslinger

If it was just about slavery, the North could have let the South go. The South’s declarations were about slavery. The North went to war about money.


97 posted on 06/10/2012 4:21:54 PM PDT by Little Ray (FOR the best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: Little Ray
If it was just about slavery, the North could have let the South go. The South’s declarations were about slavery. The North went to war about money.

Secession was for slavery as the Declarations say.

99 posted on 06/10/2012 5:34:26 PM PDT by Partisan Gunslinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

To: Little Ray

The south went to war over The Particular Institution. The north went to war over security. People who had been partners, neighbors, and even kin initiated hostilities against us and declared themselves our enemies. They breached the constitution, the law, and the peace. They stole everything that wasn’t nailed down and promised to steal more.

The set themselves apart from the rest of the union and said “We aim to kill you”.

The reaction from the north was perfectly appropriate, if perhaps understated and tentative. Lincoln approached it like a spat, hoping that cooler heads would prevail. It took him awhile to realize that there would be to sensible talk coming from the southron fire-eaters.

Lincoln did what he could and what he had to do to preserve the union - the whole union.


103 posted on 06/10/2012 6:17:32 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson