Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rockrr

“That was in dispute with many believing that there never was a “CSA” as a legal entity.”

Perhaps, but it’s not in dispute that the state of South Carolina considered it a legal entity. Doesn’t take a genius to realize if you insisted on stationed troops in their borders, THEY were going to view it as an act of war. This is one of those things where you don’t need a mutually agreed upon perception to make something a reality; one side’s perception is all it takes.


79 posted on 06/08/2012 7:49:30 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman
THEY were going to view it as an act of war.

So they declared themselves seceded from the union even though they knew it was a provocative act. The soldiers that were stationed in the area - who were Americans BTW - instantly became "the enemy" (even if they were southerners). The townspeople and local militia immediately became hostile and belligerent. Anderson, not wishing to ratchet up tensions decided to retreat to Sumter until he had clear orders to withdraw but Beauregard insisted that he quit the fort. Ultimately the southerners fired on the fort until the union forces surrendered.

The southerners deliberately instigated the hostilities which inevitably led to the war. THAT was an act of war.

83 posted on 06/08/2012 10:42:18 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson