[GraceG]

[ “Most of the adults were handcuffed, then were told what was going on and were asked for permission to search the car,” Fania said. “They all granted permission, and once nothing was found in their cars, they were un-handcuffed.” ]

So if you demanded than they provide as earch warrant I would have to wonder what “evidence” they would have “found”. Also would they have arrested you on the charge of “interfereing with a police investigation”...

[Don Corleone]

From freedom to slavery...in one generation!!!

[sport]

Illegal drugs, child pornography, illegal guns, burglary tools. They would have found them because they were who put them there. Why should they find them?

There is now no level that the police will not stoop. If you do not believe that, ask the poor guy in Stockton they beat to death just for kicks.

[X-spurt]

Let me get this right.... you suggest just going along with stupid cops wiping their rearend with the Constitution, just to not make waves?

[SargeK]

Search is invalid on its face. You cannot be handcuffed (detained) and then give “voluntary” permission to search. The statement is proof - they weren’t unhandcuffed UNTIL they gave permission to search. Coercive, null and void (and a tort under 1983).

Sue. Not for yourselves, but for anyone who may be subject to tactics like this in the future.

And I was in the police business for a long time.