Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chessplayer

Many solid conservatives support farming subsidies. The supposed alternative is market-driven prices alone. I prefer a different approach to subsidies or pure market forces when it comes to the nation’s food supply. My opinion is that federal and state governments would be wise to buy and stockpile American agricultural and livestock products when they are plenty, and allow market forces to work when they are scarce.

Our food supply chain is incredibly short. Today, if we found our nation in a depression, the death toll would be catastrophic. Fewer people are capable of growing their own food. And the efficiency of the supply chain brings with it the weakness of running out quickly when supplies are depleted.


39 posted on 06/04/2012 7:19:44 PM PDT by unlearner (You will never come to know that which you do not know until you first know that you do not know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: unlearner

The very existence of government owned stockpiles have historically been used to keep commodity prices artificially depressed.

The government programs do not insure production or supply, they insure votes.

Farmers who believe the USDA and their subsidies exist for the benefit of farmers are fools.

Consumers who believe they exist to insure their food supply, are fools.

The free marketplace works just fine, thank you. Allow farmers to grow and sell what they will at a profit, and watch the abundance!


52 posted on 06/06/2012 3:10:29 AM PDT by GilesB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson