Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WilliamIII

Deer Jeb - it seems to me that if’n you was to cut $10 in spendin’, you ain’t gunna need to raise $1 in taxes. Nuff said.


12 posted on 06/02/2012 3:32:14 PM PDT by irishtenor (Everything in moderation, however, too much whiskey is just enough... Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: irishtenor

With the Democrats, when they get serious about budget deficit reduction, that means $1 in tax increases for $4 (or more) in spending increases (euphemistically called “painful cuts”). Of course, the tax increases actually discourage the economic activity subject to the increased tax so much that they cause long-term decrease in revenue to the Treasury, whereas the spending increases result in regulation that fatally punishes economic activity, the taxation of which brings revenue to the Treasury.


45 posted on 06/02/2012 7:28:06 PM PDT by dufekin (Obama and Pelosi: at war against the Church--and innocent American babies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson