Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan; P-Marlowe
He got only about 40% of the popular vote, but 60% of the electoral vote. This was made inevitable by his opponents splitting their vote up three ways

So, you are suggesting that a 3rd party has a chance of winning. Interesting. I've been saying that all along.

111 posted on 06/02/2012 4:16:15 PM PDT by xzins (Vote for Goode Not Evil! (The lesser of 2 evils is still evil!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

Well, no.

Lincoln was the nominee of one of the two main parties.

Two other “third parties” split off part of the support of the other main party, ensuring Republican victory.

Just as one or more truly effective conservative 3rd parties would be the most efficient way to re-elect Obama.


115 posted on 06/02/2012 4:33:28 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson