My bad. I misread the whois database. That domain was registered on the 8th, not the 12th.
Still this Paypal component is a real head-scratcher. I just re-read their rules of service. It just doesn't add up. There is no way George opened that account on the 8th, and pulled $135k out on the 20th. If that happened, his website had to be tied to someone else's long standing, high volume, account.
Reading through the Prosecution's Motion looks like they are continuing to play with some very 'loose facts'.
The state is asserting that funds were in the account, not that they were liquid. And it goes on to assert that George's wife knew there was over a hundred thousand dollars there, but didn't offer that information during the bail hearing.
-- Reading through the Prosecution's Motion looks like they are continuing to play with some very 'loose facts'. --
I think the prosecutors are liars.