The guy *lied* to the state to get a driver’s license while he was two years underage. He broke the law. Then, when he got a letter asking to explain the age discrepancy, he had the nerve to complain about it.
Not every WWII to vet is a man of honor. This one certainly is not.
You're going to have to do better than that. A 91 year-old Vet of the 75th Inf. Div. awarded the bronze star for actions in the Battle of the Bulge and Legion of Honor for service in France deserves better than 'he lied about his DL or a democrat said.'
Apparently he was considered honorable enough to merit an Honorable Discharge.
If the man isn't eligible to vote, how many Floridians are eligible to vote?
Lots of assumptions here. Let's start with the first: that the driver's licenses are legitimately a function of government. Second, that, as referenced here, a "motor vehicle" might not mean [legally] what you think it does. Third, even if it is a possible legitimate function of government, it might not be used appropriately (e.g. standing armies).
Secondly, even if it is a law, it might not be a legitimate one. I'm living in SD and the state Constitution is clear "The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the state shall not be denied.", and yet there's a whole chapter dealing with what arms [or the bearing thereof] are unlawful.
Given the above, do you think it's right to jump off the deep end and call him a prick?