Thanks for the death wish, pal.
Nope.
But for what you prescribe to succeed America would have to undergo a vast cultural change in the direction of conservative values.
It would make as much sense to suggest you are engaging in psyops, encouraging the enthusiasts to invest their energy in a totally doomed to fail strategy.
Rather than concentrating on taking our culture back, which is the prerequisite to an amendment succeeding.
If you disagree with my analysis of how an amendment is not a strategy likely to succeed, why don’t you point out where my analysis is wrong, rather than attacking my motives?
Could it be because you can’t attack the analysis successfully?
How does living in a dream world, and attacking personally those who point out that it IS a dream world, help the cause?