You're wrong. Read post 193.
From where are you getting all your bogus information? Who's feeding it to you, and why do you swallow the falsehoods you're being spoon-fed hook, line, and sinker without even so much as a small glimmer of thought?
Post 193 is wrong, not in content but in your interpretation. And I’m getting this “bogus information” from the US Supreme Court.
I suspect you are confusing natural born subject status with passing that status on to multiple generations born outside of the UK.
Read WKA, section 4, starting with:
“Both in England and in the United States, indeed, statutes have been passed at various times enacting that certain issue born abroad of English subjects or of American citizens, respectively, should inherit, to some extent at least, the rights of their parents. But those statutes applied only to cases coming within their purport, and they have never been considered in either country as affecting the citizenship of persons born within its dominion.
The earliest statute was passed in the reign of Edward III. In the Rolls of Parliament of 17 Edw. III (1343), it is stated that...”