To: GOPJ
Actually, there was some talk in the media in 2008 questioning John McCain's eligibility based on his having been born in Panama--maybe that was mainly to divert attention from Obama's eligibility.
Obama could have prevented the whole controversy for $10 in 2008--that he spent so much time and money fighting the issue suggests that he has something to hide. It might not be his place of birth but something else that the documents might reveal.
To: Verginius Rufus
Obama could have prevented the whole controversy for $10 in 2008--that he spent so much time and money fighting the issue suggests that he has something to hide. It might not be his place of birth but something else that the documents might reveal. In the old days that would have been a red flag for the press - they would have looked into it... today it just means 'writing the pass' faster.
31 posted on
05/30/2012 8:06:37 AM PDT by
GOPJ
( "A Dog In Every Pot" - freeper ETL)
To: Verginius Rufus
Actually, there was some talk in the media in 2008 questioning John McCain's eligibility based on his having been born in Panama--maybe that was mainly to divert attention from Obama's eligibility.Yet, we're supposed to just believe that it was merely a coincidence that both presidential candidates had "issues" surrounding their eligibility.
40 posted on
05/30/2012 9:01:35 AM PDT by
zeugma
(Those of us who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.)
To: Verginius Rufus
>"there was some talk in the media in 2008 questioning John McCain's eligibility "What a coinkydink??? Myths daddy was born in Mexico.
Just what are the odds BOTH elections are fielded by ineligible candidates from BOTH parties?
Occam just nicked himself.
43 posted on
05/30/2012 9:25:40 AM PDT by
rawcatslyentist
("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson