In attempting to educate us unwashed peasants about “art,” she unwittingly revealed herself for an utter fool, in that she paid $100,000 for a satchel to carry her tampons in.
And she also pointed up the duplicity of a cadre of elitists who berate the common folks for neglecting the poor and downtrodden, while she and her friends vainly waste $100K on a self-indulgent stunt. That $100K could have fed a few starving peasants for years.
Or Sandra Fluck's birth control requirements for eternity.
My family could have gotten by on $100K very nicely, for a good while.
$100K would buy a decent (not upscale, but decent) house in most locations where I live, as well.
Methinks her dad is not thrilled with this "art". From what little I know, he leans conservative.
Particularly if it was his Hundred Large that originally purchased the bag. :-)