Tens of millions died under Mao because they were unarmed, not once but twice!
And I didn't want to come off as a smart ass by saying how do people die more than once. I just couldn't register that there could be another meaning to it.
>>
And I didn’t want to come off as a smart ass by saying how do people die more than once. I just couldn’t register that there could be another meaning to it.
<<
Yes, that is what I thought you meant, and I took the opportunity to substantiate the bloody history of Mao and his legacy. He was bad news twice over for the Chinese people.
Most important for westerners is that the moment that shedding blood is useful to the Communist Party, they will not hesitate to shed as much proletariat blood as is necessary for the Party to remain in control.
There are way too many in the west who are ignorant of this.