Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: theBuckwheat
Ok, I knew you didn't mean that the way it reads to me:

Tens of millions died under Mao because they were unarmed, not once but twice!

And I didn't want to come off as a smart ass by saying how do people die more than once. I just couldn't register that there could be another meaning to it.

64 posted on 05/30/2012 6:38:18 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Obama versus Romney? Cyanide versus arsenic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Graybeard58

>>
And I didn’t want to come off as a smart ass by saying how do people die more than once. I just couldn’t register that there could be another meaning to it.
<<

Yes, that is what I thought you meant, and I took the opportunity to substantiate the bloody history of Mao and his legacy. He was bad news twice over for the Chinese people.

Most important for westerners is that the moment that shedding blood is useful to the Communist Party, they will not hesitate to shed as much proletariat blood as is necessary for the Party to remain in control.

There are way too many in the west who are ignorant of this.


68 posted on 05/30/2012 7:14:16 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson