Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: norwaypinesavage

Ok, you do realize that the uranium fuel in the atomic bombs was only a few pounds much of which was consumed by fission in the blast?

The Fukishima plants have thousands of tons of uranium onsite which are at risk of burning whereby radioactive particulate is released into the environment with very little fission to consume the fuel beforehand.

A few pounds vs. thousands of tons is a significant scaling issue.


52 posted on 05/26/2012 4:22:41 AM PDT by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: Justa
"you do realize that the uranium fuel in the atomic bombs was only a few pounds much of which was consumed by fission in the blast? The Fukishima plants have thousands of tons of uranium."

You are comparing the mass of weapon grade fissionable material in a bomb with the total mass of spent fuel rods. First, only a fraction of the mass of a spent fuel rod is uranium. Second, there is no weapon grade uranium in a spent fuel rod.

59 posted on 05/26/2012 5:02:16 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson