Then the Prosecution needs to trot out this so-called evidence. Suppressing it not only calls it into question, but pretty much negates it.
This just seems really, really stupid. Would any judge refuse to unseal evidence sealed by the prosecution requested by the defense? I mean, WTF?
I’m betting it is far from detrimental to Zimmerman. I’m going with consistent to existing physical evidence.
Well there used to be these things called “trials”, where the evidence was presented.