I’m saying Hawaii verified everything for which Bennett asked, did so according to HRS 338-14.3, and that their response was meaningful not worthless.
They did not ask for any such change. They asked Bennett to prove he had a legitimate governmental need for the verification. He provided that on May 17th. He did not drop any part of his original request.
He received verification for everything he requested. Butter simply does not understand the statute she cites as it applies to the “request form” and therefore she draws errant conclusions based on a faulty premise.
(I am not copying her on this because I’ve asked her to enjoy time with her family this holiday weekend. I do not want to responsible for taking her time away from her kids.)
Not being versed in legalize (rhymes with sleaze) I cannot decipher much of the original documents.
I assume however that lawyers dealing with all this leave no room for error as their asses are on the line
In short I can no longer separate wheat from chaff in any of this.
Maybe I never could
Last I think this entire matter is more politics than legal at this points,
That is not to say its not equally important, especially before an election.
I think the question of Obamas ability to claim title of President of the US is dead in the water..... But there are lots of other reasons to look at Obama’s birth mysteries. I think that Ms Warren,the native American Harvard scholar in Mass is a prime example of what should be looked at
Where’s the embossed seal? Why is there no language in the stamped signature that certifies that the registrar has his butt on the line and swears that this “record” they have is legally valid? Where did that form number come from?