Posted on 05/22/2012 4:12:28 PM PDT by wagglebee
As long as abortion is legal and the left continues to lie about it, people like this lady need to speak out. It's only the truth that is going to counter the lies so many women are being fed these days about abortion.
If you demand that the truth be withheld, then you are aiding and abetting the vocal pro-aborts in their mission to destroy lives.
In order for abortion to stop, the truth MUST be told and who better than someone who knows the evil that it is?
"Suffer discretely" my foot.
Truth is often uncomfortable. But which truth?
I had a hard time for many years dealing with graphic depictions of dead unborn babies.
Having had many miscarriages, I would hope you can understand why I am still not a “fan” of those photos.
No, I didn't intentionally kill my children, but still they died in my womb, and I still mourned each loss, alone.
The women I personally know who had abortions were heavily pressured into them by our so called “society” since abortion is “legal”.
Past time for a female backlash, IMHO.
It’s disturbing, but then again, hiding the awful truth only makes it easier for people avoid the issue instead of dealing with it.
I do have a problem with publicly displaying the graphic photos. The first time I saw them was when I was a child, and someone had put stickers with those sorts of pictures up at the train station, where some schoolmates and I stumbled on them. People aught to keep in mind that kids will see stuff like that, and they can’t process it as easily as adults can.
It’s going to have to come out. I don’t mean now, though that would be helpful, but at some point.
I think “suffering discreetly” is for suffering which comes about through no fault of one’s own; while talking about one’s own mistakes, with the intent of preventing or alleviating others’ suffering is another thing. It’s altruistic as opposed to cathartic. It is not pretty and it is not proper, but haven’t we gone way past that with this.
Are people aware that there is a reported 53 million babies killed through abortion since 1973? It’s 4,000 a day. THose numbers are just the reported abortions and not others and not those caused by abortifacient BC pills.
Those are US numbers. Just in the US.
B U M P
Have had many miscarriages but never a problem with photos. When we were 12 and found out about this we were jorrified. We talked about how it was done. HTis was the topic of conversation on the bus. We were allowed to think, back then.If people aren’t thinking about what happens, graphically, in an abortion, then they are not thinking about what’s really happening.
And so far as being disturbed by the photos; just imagine what the baby thinks.
Jorrified is another word for horrified.
I've read several articles by women who've written about their abortion experience and this one by far seems to be the most genuine. I also got the sense that she's truly repented of what she did.
Women need to know what a life and soul destroying evil abortion is. Heck, we warn all kinds of people about all kinds of things that are bad for them. We should stop at abortion?
I don't think so.
Not only what you have said, but how many discoveries may have been lost because one of these human being didn’t exist?
This post should be required reading for all women who are considering abortion. It not only addresses the mental anguish that will inevitably result, but also addresses the physical damage to the uterus that often occurs. This woman was unable to have more than one surviving child and I have heard testimonies from many woman who said they were never able to conceive again.
The pro-choice crowd wants women like this to remain silent so that the lie that abortion is a “private matter between a woman and her doctor” can be perpetuated. If talking about a previous abortion saves even one innocent life, it is well worth the discomfort some may feel upon hearing about such a “private matter”. IMO, murder is not and should not ever be considered a private matter!
I admire her courage. I hope she understands that she will be continually dumped on by those who are rabidly pro-abortion. They’re afraid that her testimony might actually start having an effect on folks who might be only mildly pro-abortion, because they think it’s the ‘sophisticated’ way to think.
I don’t mind hearing her say it in this context. What I don’t like is women murdering their children and thinking it’s a good thing, and encouraging others to do the same.
But what if her words shock just one woman into realizing that abortion is murder and she can't kill her own baby?
The difference in Paul’s case was he was doing it because he was doing God’s work, getting rid of people who were worshipping someone who blasphemed he was God in the flesh. This woman was just getting rid of a personal problem.
Not saying either was right but motives were completely different.
I’m just saying, just as parents should be free to decide whether or not their kids are exposed to graphic violence, or nudity, or adult themes in movies, the parents are the ones that should decide if their kids are ready to see graphic photos of abortions. Putting the pictures out in public where kids can’t help but see them takes that decision out of the parents’ hands.
I had a friend who had an illegal abortion at 17. She can tell you exactly how old her son would be today.... and she is an alcoholic.
Would you say that “Uncle Tom’s Cabin” should never have been published, that the peculiar Southern institution regarding the Negros was a private matter, not to be mentioned by people with good manners?
-——She can tell you exactly how old her son would be today-——
Most women who have abortions can....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.