I never said Darwinists don't understand my arguments. I said I had mainly been unsuccessful in getting them to question their presuppositions.
Don't write into me what I didn't say. And I don't care *who* you are: a misrepresentation is a misrepresentation.
Must run.
Goode = Obama victory.
His positions are irrelevant. He is just a ralph nader.
His entire victor is based on a devil buying ice skates.
I think you need to go back and read what I said again. The only thing in quotes was "Darwinists," which you most assuredly did compare us to. The rest, the part about "not understanding your arguments," in addition to being incorrect, was also intended to be parallel with but not directly connected with the "Darwinists" part.
Don't write into me what I didn't say. And I don't care *who* you are: a misrepresentation is a misrepresentation.
It's unfortunate that so many FReepers fall into the bad habit of assuming that whenever there is a disagreement in the interpretation of something they have written, that this means the other person is lying. This has been an ugly and unattractive trait on this forum for years now.