To: jboot
Sorry to unfix your fix, but God intended the point of view of the author to figure in the meaning. You can’t take a statement born in specific circumstance and turn it blanket like you would want to. You can justify Christian “jihads” that way if you do.
85 posted on
05/22/2012 12:55:45 PM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(Churches are full of hypocrites you say? Welcome: there's always room for one more.)
To: HiTech RedNeck
You can’t take a statement born in specific circumstance and turn it blanket like you would want to. You can justify Christian “jihads” that way if you do.There is no scriptural justification for inferences to editorialize scripture.
And no, it is not a justification for Christian jihad. In fact "Hath God Said?" has always been the beginning of twisting God's word.
87 posted on
05/22/2012 1:02:14 PM PDT by
papertyger
("And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if..."))
To: HiTech RedNeck
So, in your opinion, is Psalm 139 profitable for the Christian, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness? Or not?
94 posted on
05/22/2012 3:36:26 PM PDT by
jboot
(Emperor: "How will this end?" Kosh: "In fire.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson