Skip to comments.
Hillary Clinton will be the 2012 veep candidate
The Washington Times ^
| May 20, 2012
| Joseph Curl
Posted on 05/20/2012 4:03:28 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
To: TwelveOfTwenty
Scares the crap out of me....because it could work. A demoralized party and all those disaffected Hillary supporters will come charging back. And Mittens would get steamrolled. Putting off any substantial home improvements and other big expenditures until after November 6th. If he’s re-elected, we as a country are toast.
41
posted on
05/20/2012 4:51:19 PM PDT
by
SueRae
(The Tower of Sauron falls on 11.06.2012)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The country is lost if this happens. They are the same.
42
posted on
05/20/2012 4:51:37 PM PDT
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: TwelveOfTwenty
Scares the crap out of me....because it could work. A demoralized party and all those disaffected Hillary supporters will come charging back. And Mittens would get steamrolled. Putting off any substantial home improvements and other big expenditures until after November 6th. If he’s re-elected, we as a country are toast.
43
posted on
05/20/2012 4:51:37 PM PDT
by
SueRae
(The Tower of Sauron falls on 11.06.2012)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
No one can save the Obama Presidency.
44
posted on
05/20/2012 4:53:49 PM PDT
by
fortheDeclaration
(Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
“Run Sarah Palin in opposition.
Just saying.
“
So very wrong. Run Condelezza Rice in opposition.
45
posted on
05/20/2012 4:54:59 PM PDT
by
staytrue
To: TwelveOfTwenty
Why do you think Hillary would add anything to the Democrat ticket?
She is ancient, and I do mean ancient history.
46
posted on
05/20/2012 4:55:53 PM PDT
by
fortheDeclaration
(Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
If it happens, Barry better have someone tasting his food.
47
posted on
05/20/2012 4:56:01 PM PDT
by
Veggie Todd
(I don't mind you hitting me, Frank, but take it easy on the Bacardi.)
To: All
48
posted on
05/20/2012 4:56:23 PM PDT
by
Kevmo
(Palin 2012. It's just me in the voting booth. 100% straight republican ticket.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I thought in 2008 that the selection of Biden would sink the Obama candidacy. I was wrong then, but Crazy Joe, who knows lots of things that just aren’t so” is still a very, very weak partner for Obama.
49
posted on
05/20/2012 4:58:32 PM PDT
by
cookcounty
("We're all born idiots, and we only get over that condition as we get less young." -J Goldberg)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
As The Washington Times laid out last week, Mr. Obamas re-election is no lock. Understatement of the year.
50
posted on
05/20/2012 4:59:08 PM PDT
by
fortheDeclaration
(Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Doesn’t matter, they are both useless marxist morons, and one of them is really, really ugly, while the other is just incredibly dumb and has funny looking hair.
51
posted on
05/20/2012 5:00:25 PM PDT
by
chris37
(Heartless.)
To: SueRae
No one is running back to the Democrats to get Obama reelected.
His problem isn't with the hard core Democrats, his problem is with Independents and they aren't to care about Hillary.
52
posted on
05/20/2012 5:01:35 PM PDT
by
fortheDeclaration
(Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
To: staytrue
"So very wrong. Run Condelezza Rice in opposition."
-
Works just as well for me!!
Palin would be my first choice, but I've long believed in Rice.
Before you print up bumper stickers though, her name is spelled Condoleezza.
:D
To: 2ndDivisionVet
No way!
If she thought she had the slightest chance of being on the ticket, she would not have “let herself go”! It is my contention that she has no further plans to run for public office, so she is free to be herself, which is a radical feminist, marxist, and child of the sixties.
I bet that the Obama’s and the Clinton’s can’t stand to be in the same room together.
54
posted on
05/20/2012 5:06:17 PM PDT
by
CarolinaGOP
("Within the covers of the Bible are the answers for all the problems men face." - Ronald Reagan)
To: Sacajaweau
Thank God she does not want it. If she did, we would lose and lose big. Democrats would be enthusiastic again. It would be the biggest disaster for Republicans ever. I am glad that she will NOT do this.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The Shakedown Central Committee is behind the Massachusetts Mandate-Man. So she’d only agree to run with Mandate-Mitt, as part of the Phony-Party facade.
56
posted on
05/20/2012 5:12:22 PM PDT
by
Varsity Flight
(Phony-Care is the Government Work-Camp: Arbeitsziehungslager)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Obama can’t dump Biden. Beau Biden has Obama by the short hairs.
57
posted on
05/20/2012 5:19:28 PM PDT
by
abclily
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I'm not so sure it would be that easy to get rid of Biden. It all depends on why Biden was chosen the first time and I think it was blackmail. If he was able to blackmail Obama the first time around he would still be able to this time.
58
posted on
05/20/2012 5:34:40 PM PDT
by
Amntn
To: 2ndDivisionVet
59
posted on
05/20/2012 5:41:14 PM PDT
by
panaxanax
(Voting 'Third Party' will ensure a Communist-Marxist-Socialist dominated Supreme Court!)
To: fortheDeclaration
Why do you think Hillary would add anything to the Democrat ticket? She would add the memory of "Clinton's economy" and "the peace and prosperity of the Clinton years" to the ticket. I understand you would never go for that, and neither would I, but many would. Accept it or not, the Clintons are still popular. It wouldn't matter if she doesn't add anything of substance to the ticket, because the "promise" of another Clinton in the White House might be enough.
It could work for them, if we don't have answers to "Clinton's economy" ready.
60
posted on
05/20/2012 5:46:57 PM PDT
by
TwelveOfTwenty
(With choices like Palin, Cain, and Bachmann, what could go wrong? Now we know.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson