At the core of this issue is the definition of what causes homosexuality. Is it genetic or something else? If it is genetic, then why hasn’t it evolved out of existence since gays don’t produce children via their relationships. If it is not genetic, then are the rights being demanded by gays different from rights others receive and therefore a special case?
They don’t reproduce, they recruit.
Marriage is a religious rite, not a civil right.
Monogamy is a tenet of religion.
All men are born of a woman.
Prohibition of polyandry and polygyny is an ecclesiastic rule of law.
In your unabridged Oxford Dictionaries, the word “faggotry” denotes the bundling of steel to be hammered or rolled together.
To establish an ecclesiastic standard of monogamy for homosexuals is nothing but RELIGIOUS FAGGOTRY.
In primitive societies you might have a polygamous system, where the wealthy/powerful take multiple wives. If the losers can satisfy themselves with homosexuality, then you have less strife.
I don’t think the liberals want us to ask what causes homosexuality.
Lady Gag has sung to us that they are “born that way”. Case closed, as far as liberals are concerned. We’re not allowed to ask what causes this condition, whether it’s “normal”, because liberals have decided we need to normalize this condition.
We can’t talk about whether it’s harmful, because it’s homophobic to talk about AIDS and other VD spread by homosexual behavior.
The liberals rules of speaking about issues makes it hard to even raise the questions about causes and issues with homosexual behavior.