This is from Ken Bennett’s site :
http://www.azsos.gov/releases/
Ken Bennett’s Statement Regarding President Obama’s Birth Certificate
“First, I have been on the record since 2009 that I believe the President was born in Hawaii. I am not a “birther”. At the request of a constituent, I asked the state of Hawaii for a for a verification in lieu of certified copy. We’re merely asking them to officially confirm they have the President’s birth certificate in their possession and are awaiting their response.” - Ken Bennett
********
This is mirse.
If Bennett is "merely asking them to officially confirm they have the President’s birth certificate in their possession and are awaiting their response", then I don't think he is asking for much, which means that Hawaii will no problems giving Bennett what he wants, and which also means that Obama will have no problems getting his name on the Nov. 2012 Arizona ballot.
1. A vague Hawaii statement like "Dear Mr. Bennett: Yes, we have President Obama's birth certificate in our possession" really doesn't tell us whether or not Obama was born at Kapiolani hospital in Hawaii on Aug. 4, 1961.
2. NOTE: It has been a year since Obama released a copy of his long form birth certificate to great fanfare at a White House press meeting in April 2011.
3. But yet Kapiolani hospital officials---Kapiolani hospital is listed on the long form birth certificate---have not said one word about Obama being born there.
4. For instance, why don't they conduct tours to let people view the room where Obama was born and put up a small plaque outside the room stating that Obama's mother stayed in that room in Aug. 1961?
5. I don't see how conducting such tours would be violating medical privacy laws, especially if Obama publicly said that he did not object to such tours.
6. So if Kapiolani continues to be conspicuously silent about whether or not Obama was born there, then I can only conclude the following: Kapiolani hospital will not conduct tours to let people look at the room where Obama's mother stayed in Aug. 1961 because she was never there in the first place.
Obama should provide proof of identity, but he hasn’t. Bennett is trying to help Obama and is going the extra mile, asking Hawaii for records.
Hawaii is acting in bad faith and is denying Bennett’s request.
Bennett did all he could do. Without proof of ID there is simply no way he can allow Obama’s name on the ballot. Bennett went the extra mile on Obama’s behalf. What more is he supposed to do?
Hawaii’s denial forces Arizona to disallow Obama’s name on any ballot.
Obama has only himself to blame.
No proof, no ballot.