Who is saying that it is the smoking gun?
The only one I even see implying such a thing is you.
It seems to me you can't recognize when a glass is "topped".
Here ya go... 
“Oh, no, your replies show beyond a shadow of a doubt that you’re still attempting to ‘bury the lead’ through your diversive ramblings.”
Huh? How, when in my very first post I said not only are non-birther “bullied by common sense [implying birthers lack common sense] and a lack of desperation to remove a president they hate from office on any pretext whatsoever [implying birthers are desperate to remove Obama on any pretext whatsoever],” in addition to saying “You birthers really, really have to stop pretending everything’s a smoking gun,” and comparing them to the boy who cried wolf? It’s not enough that other people disagree with you and you think they’re wrong, is it? They must be dissemblers as well. Only you argue properly, and it is your cross to bear.
“You seem intent on trying to avoid acknowledging that this directly points, in any way, to presidential eligibility.”
Why, yes, I do believe that. No, I have not avoided acknowledging that. My very first post on this thread said out loud and in front of God’s creation that this is not a smoking gun, and birthers do themselves a disservice by pretending it is. That lead was not buried. I don’t think this proves Obama is not an NBC, and I’m saying it again. (Countdown to you accusing me once again of hiding it in 5, 4, 3,...)
I enjoy that “directly...in any way,” by the way. Covers you from all angles, doesn’t it? “Why no, I didn’t mean directly directly, I said in any way.”
It seems to me you can't recognize when a glass is "topped".
Here ya go...