Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sequoyah101
Lockheed does not have experience in carrier airplanes

That will come as news to Viking crews and some Neptune crews not to mention one KC-130 crew and a U-2 pilot.

VSTOL is a questionable “asset”.(sic)

The correct acronym is STOVL and the Marine Corps has four+ decades of experience that proves you are wrong.

Everyone is entitled to an opinion.

We certainly know what yours is worth.

13 posted on 05/18/2012 7:22:25 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: A.A. Cunningham

And the defenders of the F-35 rise again like the Kraken from the sea.

Yes, they did build the Viking, that is true. A nice little airplane.

The Navy will be greatly relieved that you know all about C-130 operations to and from carriers. You can remedy their current problem with the F-35 engine deliveries to carriers since the current COD does not have a large enough fuselage interior for the new and large engines of the F-35.

The harrier proves nothing when compared to the F-35 variant. Too much fan and not enough fuel or payload but lots of hot air.

Have a nice day.


15 posted on 05/18/2012 7:37:12 PM PDT by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson