Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Damn, more good news about the flying anvil...
1 posted on 05/18/2012 3:55:00 PM PDT by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Yo-Yo
I wish they hadn't taken the jack of all trades design philosophy for the F-35, as the teething pains and the bill for this approach is always much worse.

That said, the F-35 will end up being an outstanding asset for decades to come.

We will be grateful to those who kept the program alive through this phase, as will the next couple of generations who live with it and fight with it.

And best of all, it isn't the Boeing Monica! Boy howdy, that thing is one seriously FUGLY aeroplane!

2 posted on 05/18/2012 4:11:23 PM PDT by GBA (Read: The Harbinger by Jonathan Cahn If you read this anything this year, read this book!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Yo-Yo

They are “optimistic” they will be able to pick up this turd by the clean end......soon.


3 posted on 05/18/2012 4:12:44 PM PDT by diogenes ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

When I was in the Air Force from 1977-81, the aircraft that I worked on was the F-111A. Talk about your turd, the F-111 program was it to the nines.

However, the F-111F was a very capable aircraft that kicked Lybian ass on one of the the then longest non-stop combat sorties in USAF history, and was a champion tank-plinker in GW I.

The Jack-of-all-trades F-35 mentality came out of trying to design an aircraft to replace the F-16, F/A-18A and -C, and the AV-8B. The F-16’s multiple roles were slowly developed over decades, not designed in all at once.

It’s sort of like building a small house, then over the decades adding a family room, and a garage, and extra bedrooms, then wanting to build a new house that has to have all of those atributes of the old house from the start.

Of course the new house is going to cost much, much more and take much longer to build than the original 2 bedroom bungalow did 30 years ago...


10 posted on 05/18/2012 5:26:12 PM PDT by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Yo-Yo
Lockheed is also set to test fixes to the jet's troublesome helmet-mounted display (HMD) this summer, O'Bryan says. Lockheed has reached an agreement with the US government on the HMD requirements, which will help the company to fix imagery lag on the helmet by tweaking the system's software, he says.

The company is also adding micro inertial measurement units (IMU) to the helmet and pilot's seat to dampen out jittery images. "We're going to fly those micro-IMUs this summer," O'Bryan says. Lockheed hopes that the new ISIE-11 camera, which replaces the existing ISIE-10 cameras, will resolve jet's night vision acuity problems. The new system will undergo testing at MIT's Lincoln Labs later this summer.

The system will now consist of two ISIE-11 cameras, one of which will be mounted in the helmet and another on the canopy bow, and imagery pumped in from the F-35's six distributed aperture system (DAS) infrared cameras.

Hope they are using US made chips, not Chinese.

Hate to be flying along at night, in weather, when the Chinese turn the chip off by remote control

30 posted on 05/21/2012 12:05:52 PM PDT by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Yo-Yo

Just curious...anybody know if the F35 has OBOGS as well?

Has it been poisoning/LOC/hypoxying (if that’s a word) test pilots?


31 posted on 05/21/2012 12:12:07 PM PDT by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson