Romney is not acceptable to many conservatives, if the only reason you can find to vote for him is that he is not Obama then that is sinply not good enough.
Accusing those who do not like Romney of being part of the Obama campaign (remember those trueblue gluesniffers?) is insidious.
I have said that 85% of freepers will probably end up voting for Romney. Why is that not good enough for you? Why do you insist that a socialist leftist get the suicidal imprimature of this conservative website?
You can vote how you like, none of us on this side are telling you how to vote, so why does your side feel that need?
It's good enough because Romney, not being Obama,he is better than Obama, the worst president in our history whose removal is imperative to the nation's survival.
Accusing those who do not like Romney of being part of the Obama campaign (remember those trueblue gluesniffers?) is insidious.
I don't accuse anyone of being part of the Obama campaign because they don't like Romney. I don't like Romney. I just dislike Obama much more.I'm simply saying that withholding a vote for Romney helps Obama. That should be beyond dispute.
I have said that 85% of freepers will probably end up voting for Romney. Why is that not good enough for you? Why do you insist that a socialist leftist get the suicidal imprimature of this conservative website?
Not insisting on anything, just stating the obvious: if Romney is not elected it's 4 more years of destruction by Obama and the "Progressives." I think Romney would be better than Obama so I'm suggesting that conservatives vote for him as the lesser of two evils (if that characterization makes anyone feel better).
You can vote how you like, none of us on this side are telling you how to vote, so why does your side feel that need?,p>
You can also vote as you like. What is "your side" going to do? Sit it out (helps Obama), vote for a write-in (helps Obama), vote for a third party (helps Obama), or vote for the Usurper himself?