I heard Crump already say that Martin’s knuckles were bruised from bravely trying to disarm a crazed Zimmerman.
Yes, the prosecution will claim that Zimmerman said something and then flashed the pistol. Martin feared for his life and tried to take the pistol away from Zimmerman, fighting for several minutes knowing that his life was in jeopardy, but lost to the larger, white man.
Funny, Crump can anything in his opening argument but when it comes down to producing the evidence to support his contention the well is dry.
I hope this case does not come down to “how long does it take you to prepare your grits”.
“I heard Crump already say that Martin’s knuckles were bruised from bravely trying to disarm a crazed Zimmerman...Martin feared for his life and tried to take the pistol away from Zimmerman, fighting for several minutes knowing that his life was in jeopardy, but lost to the larger, white man.”
I might wonder why trying to disarm someone would harm only your knuckles. And if there was a struggle which Zimmerman eventually won, why did Zimmerman not also have bruised knucles, and why were there not injuries to the rest of Martin’s body in the manner of Zimmerman. How is it possible for Martin to have so injured Zimmerman in taking away his gun and for Zimmerman to end up with the gun eventually without similarly injuring Martin? it boggles the mind.
Let’s say that’s how it happened. Fine. How does the prosecution prove it? They’d have to prove that it happened as you say, and that Zimmerman’s injuries resulted from Martin’s struggle to get the gun. How? There’s no evidence in the world that I’m aware of. This case is a loser.
Funny on TV suspects always run, even when told to stop.