Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Free ThinkerNY

I would be fine with that, provided women recruits were held to the EXACT SAME standards as the men, and the standards were not lowered to get some acceptable number of women through.


9 posted on 05/16/2012 11:14:16 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (If I canÂ’t be persuasive, I at least hope to be fun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625

See my #10 - great minds, my FRiend!


11 posted on 05/16/2012 11:15:25 AM PDT by jagusafr ("Write in Palin and prepare for war...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625

“women recruits were held to the EXACT SAME standards as the men, and the standards were not lowered”

Yep I agree..


34 posted on 05/16/2012 11:36:50 AM PDT by montanajoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625

Yep, just as long as the _exact_ same standard are kept. That includes combat loads and injured comrade carry requirements.


56 posted on 05/16/2012 12:30:32 PM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625

I agree, but it’ll never happen. Day 1, the first thing you do is take the APFT (plus 6 chin-ups from a dead hang), which has different standards for men and women.

Day 2, the first thing you do is a 5-mile run in formation at an 8-min/mile pace.

I certainly know some women who could do those things to the same standards as men, but not many—which would negate the point of allowing women into Ranger school in the first place.


73 posted on 05/16/2012 2:31:05 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson