Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Future Snake Eater
I honestly don’t even understand the point of this, though I don’t really understand non-combat arms folks being allowed to Ranger school period. Ranger school is supposed to simulate protracted combat,

I can see the point for men: these days, even if you're in a support unit, you can find yourself in deep kimche.

For women, the reason is combat command. The feminists will not be satisfied until at least 50% of senior combat commanders are women. If the path to senior combat-arms command requires the Ranger-School ticket punch (being Ranger-qualed is a requirement for combat-arms company commanders ), then they will demand to be allowed to pass Ranger school.

80 posted on 05/16/2012 3:23:18 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 (If I canÂ’t be persuasive, I at least hope to be fun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625

a) If men in support units can find themselves in “deep kimche,” then so can the women who have a large presence in such units. By that rationale, women have every reason to go to Ranger school.

b) Being tabbed is NOT a requirement for combat arms company commanders. Granted, it makes you more likely to get selected for command, but now that we’ve been at war for over a decade, the Ranger tab just doesn’t mean what it used to. Now it’s all about how you did as a combat leader at the Platoon level. As we transition into peacetime again, I’m sure the tab will begin to carry more weight.


81 posted on 05/16/2012 3:39:30 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson