First, your example of kiddie porn isn’t valid because the making of it violates the rights of the kids involved and parental rights (in most cases). The exercise of YOUR rights may not involve violating the rights of others.
Second, the legitimate exercise of your rights is NOT subject to a vote of ANYONE. EVER.
Third, the exercise of your rights may not ever involve the coerced participation of a third party, such as a doctor. (There is NO RIGHT to health care at the expense of others.)
Fourth, your willingness to subject my rights to limitations imposed by others tells me that you have areas that YOU want controlled in other people. Never yourself, of course; it’s always your neighbor or the guy down the block whose non-coercive behavior needs controlling.
Fifth, the ONLY legitimate restriction on RKBA is a LOCAL regulation regarding where and when a firearm may be discharged in a NON-EMERGENCY situation. That’s it and that’s all.
Really? Where are those rights enshrined? And who are you to impose limitations on what is and is not a right based on accidental (in the Socratic sense) characteristics?
Furthermore, don't presume to discern my intentions: that gradation of analysis is way over your head.
Finally, I'm done with you. It is clear to me you'll reach up your poop chute to pull out any convenient, not to mention arbitrary, contrivance to maintain your doctrinaire, albeit impracticable, posture.