I think he’s right. Add homosexuals pretending marriage to the cost of social security, health care, military health, and retirement in general, and you have enormously upped the cost JUST BECAUSE of someone’s preferred method of orgasming.
The reason behind heterosexual government incentives is the potential procreativity and the known fact that moms and dads are the best source of socialization for children.
The state has an interest in encouraging the best means of providing for children, but it hasn’t a bit of interest in how someone gets their jollies.
And never forget that nationally legal same-sex marriage would institutionalize same-sex couples on every rung of the society and government. From pre-schoolers being taught what the new definition of marriage is (marrying either your friend Billy or Janey, whichever one you love), to schools having to make both kinds of couples their prom king/queen, to every church and business having to treat same-sex couples the same. Whether this all would automatically come with a new marriage law, or would be “interpreted” as being part of the law by the courts, it all would happen. This would be a fundamental change in society with sweeping implications in every facet of life and ominous concerns about how the next generation of children would develop.
Exactly. Where does the homosexualist movement think the money from future generations is going to come from if there is no future generations. Of course they’ll try to say “Gays can reproduce” to which I respond certainly. They can reproduce heterosexually just like the rest of us do. But there is no such thing as homosexual “reproduction.”