No one said he would be the “Savior.” Did you even read what I posted?
It is clear that Romney governed liberally in Mass. He had to, the legisalture was 85% DNC. Ask some one like Betty Boop who lived here while he was governor.
The Governor in Mass has very little power in appointing Supreme Court Judges in Mass. There’s a committee that oversees the thing which he first must get past, then there is the legislature that held an absolute veto proof majority.
Take a look at the 300 some odd vetoes Romney made...they will tell you something about him too.
If you do not take the time to talk to solid conservatives in Mass who were there under Romney, or really personal;ly take the time and effort to examine for yourself his record, his vetoes, etc. Then plase do not lecture me about manipulating reality, lemmings, or following blindly.
RomneyCare is really MassCare because it is what the people wanted. I believe it would have been far worse without Romney being there...as it is, I don’t agree with it, particularly because of the mandate portion.
But Romney’s influence over what was going to happen there as regards Health Care was not great. He was mainly elected there because of his financial capabilities.
Anyhow, as I said in my last post to you. We are not going to get this back all at once. We are going to have to fight and claw our way back. Romney represents something better than Obbama by far...and something that is running on the issues I pointed you to, despite his actions there in Mass. If we put in a conservative Congress (and notice I didn’t say GOP, and I didn’t for a reason, even though they will be Republicans...they have to be a Tea PArty conservative sort of Republicans), which we have to do in any case, they will hold him to his commitments.
You may disparage that if you will and that is your choice, but try not to be insulting and imagine that those of us trying to get rid of Obama with Romney do not understand the score or the risks involved with it.
There is simply no better alternative right now.
“It is clear that Romney governed liberally in Mass. He had to, the legisalture was 85% DNC.”
~ ~ ~
Does “liberally” mean, it is a woman’s choice to kill her newly conceived child?
Ignoring your “man” for who he is again. Romney signed so he agreed to abortion provided in Romneycare.
He lies now and says he is for life. The same on sodomy. He prefers homosexuals adopt children instead of saying no
as the Catholic agencies wanted. A child needs a mother and
a father, not a mother and a mother or a father and a father.
p.s. You’re silent, like Romney, concerning your Mormon belief on the Incarnation. What do you say of those quotes of Bringham Young and Joseph Smith that I shared? Falsely claiming, so unChristian.
Mary DID NOT conceive Our Lord by God the Father!
Answer to their quotes specifically and paste them please.
Dear Jeff, I've already written about this, here. It didn't seem to make any difference to people who have already made up their minds that Romney is an evil Left Progressive liberal and spawn of Hell.
But you cannot get blood out of a stone — the stone here being the Massachusetts political machine as fronted by a Legislature that is overwhelmingly and openly Marxist in its approach to all public questions.
I wouldn't characterize him as governing as a "liberal" here at all. He actually got tax cuts passed.... Which is a very big deal in Taxachusetts — tax cutting definitely goes against the normal grain hereabouts.
Plus as a holder of a Class A License to Carry (a high-capacity firearm "for all lawful purposes"), I was deeply impressed by the ease with which I was able to renew my license under his Administration, and the greater ease that first-time applicants for firearms licensing now enjoy as compared with past experience in this state.
FWIW.
Thanks ever so much for writing, dear Jeff!