Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Virgil)Goode: Romney ‘father of homosexual marriages’ (Constitution Party Candidate)
Augusta Free Press ^ | 12 May 12 | Augusta Free Press

Posted on 05/14/2012 10:53:24 AM PDT by xzins

Former Fifth District Congressman Virgil Goode blasted presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney as “the father of homosexual marriages” in a statement released to the news media on the eve of Romney’s visit to Liberty University this weekend.

Goode, now running for president on the Constitution Party ticket, referred to Romney’s move as Massachusetts governor to issue same-sex marriage licenses in the wake of a state-court ruling.

“Gov. Romney did not stand fast in favor of traditional marriage,” said Goode, who lost his Fifth District seat in 2008 to Democrat Tom Perriello.

Goode said he has been a “consistent supporter of defining marriage as being between one man and one woman.”

“At this point in our country’s history, we need a president who will stand firmly behind traditional marriage and the Federal Marriage Amendment. I am suspicious that Gov. Romney, if elected president, could waffle again,” Goode said.

The stakes, to Goode: “If homosexual marriages become normal across the country, the impact on states like Virginia, which prohibit gay marriage, will be huge. State taxpayers will have to pay for the expanded health insurance costs and State retirement costs. At the federal level, the impact on the Social Security Trust Fund and the Department of Defense will be significant when homosexual partners are granted the same monetary benefits that heterosexual married couples have under current Social Security law and provisions covering military spouses,” he said.


TOPICS: Editorial; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: bhohomosexualagenda; constitutionparty; elections; gaymarriage; goode; goode4obama; homosexualagenda; marriage; obamasstalkinghorse; romney; romney4nytimes; romneymarriage; romneytruthfile; romneyvsclerks; thirdparty; va2012; virgilgoode
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-198 next last
To: xzins; cripplecreek
Ping-a-ling

I myself am still unsure about Goode, but he is no Massachusetts Liberal masquerading in Conservative clothing.

21 posted on 05/14/2012 11:27:43 AM PDT by KC_Lion (I am finished with listening to empty promises of the great GOP saving me in 4 more years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Goode is the only conservative in the race. Are you going to tell us all that you think Romney is a conservative?

Goode is surely not in the race. Get real: few outside of his treehouse have even heard of him. Is Romney a conservative? Of course not. Bachmann, Cain, and even Rick Perry could be called conservative but they are also called "unsuccessful candidates".

22 posted on 05/14/2012 11:28:33 AM PDT by GOP_Party_Animal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: xzins
We warned all of romney’s supporters that a man cannot run from the truth... and although people can and do evolve and change their opinions on certain things... no one... and I mean no one ever changes everything that they have been and believed in. He also cannot run from his past governing record. The TRUTH can set you free... and it can also destroy you... for the truth is the truth.

LLS

23 posted on 05/14/2012 11:33:03 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Don't Tread On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
I will NOT be counted as supporting infanticide.

Neither DNC candidate Bamma or Albinobamma will get my vote either.

24 posted on 05/14/2012 11:34:18 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist ("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Party_Animal
Goode is surely not in the race.

He's in the race enough to possibly throw Virginia to Obama. Losing Virginia would be fatal to Romney's campaign.

25 posted on 05/14/2012 11:36:03 AM PDT by Drew68 (I WILL vote to defeat Barack Hussein Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: xzins

And never forget that nationally legal same-sex marriage would institutionalize same-sex couples on every rung of the society and government. From pre-schoolers being taught what the new definition of marriage is (marrying either your friend Billy or Janey, whichever one you love), to schools having to make both kinds of couples their prom king/queen, to every church and business having to treat same-sex couples the same. Whether this all would automatically come with a new marriage law, or would be “interpreted” as being part of the law by the courts, it all would happen. This would be a fundamental change in society with sweeping implications in every facet of life and ominous concerns about how the next generation of children would develop.


26 posted on 05/14/2012 11:36:18 AM PDT by JediJones (From the makers of Romney, Bloomberg/Schwarzenegger 2016. Because the GOP can never go too far left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
and although people can and do evolve and change their opinions on certain things

That's an understatement with this piece of work:

Willard last Thursday: "I support the right of homos to adopt"
Willard last Friday: "I meant to say I support laws in the books, and if there is a law in some state which allows homo adoption then I guess I support that law because it is a law"
27 posted on 05/14/2012 11:40:47 AM PDT by kevcol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Unfortunately, the "conservatives" left in the GOP, who have been taking the lesser of two evil stance for so long now, have pretty much become CINO's. To be sure, they are to the right of the middle of the road, GOP faithful, but not by much. But of course each individual voter has the right to cast his/her vote as they see fit. That includes those of us who will no longer cast our votes simply to put the GOP in power.

I am thinking Goode is good for me. Solid Constitutional Conservative credentials.

28 posted on 05/14/2012 11:42:27 AM PDT by ImpBill ("America, where are you now?" - Little "r" republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Romney is fatal to Romney’s campaign. I just can’t vote for someone who believes children should be raised by homosexuals, among a whole lotta other things.


29 posted on 05/14/2012 11:48:45 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

I find Goode to be an acceptable compromise. Besides, he hasn’t endorsed gay adoption that I’m aware of.


30 posted on 05/14/2012 11:49:00 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: xzins
IMO shameless chameleon Romney has ALWAYS waffled in the direction of what will insure his next election! To me, this means he will pretend to the greatest extent possible to be conservative on family, right-to-life and SCOTUS appointments to win the 2012 election and will maintain the same conservative persona and narrative right through the 2016 reelection campaign.

The earliest date that Romney could flip again away from conservative positions would be on Jan 20 2017, IMO. With any luck by then he will have appointed two Federalist Society blessed strict constructionists to SCOTUS to replace at least one ACLU justice (Ginsberg). In contrast, failing to remove the ineligible Marxist Manchurian in a tight race by conservatives failing to vote FOR the GOP alternative could insure more ACLU justices, more abortions and total mainstreaming of the homosexualist agenda as tipping SCOTUS will permit activist leftist justices with a 5-4 majority to impose gay marriage and Roe nationwide in all states.

Failure to remove Barry ASAP will permit him to dismantle our offensive military force projection and defensive missile efforts and make our former allies drift further away from the USA setting us up for 1938 all over again...especially in the South China Sea.

31 posted on 05/14/2012 11:49:27 AM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goseminoles

>Reality sucks..

The Seminoles suck.
(sorry, had to get that in there)


32 posted on 05/14/2012 11:52:38 AM PDT by libdestroyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
He's in the race enough to possibly throw Virginia to Obama. Losing Virginia would be fatal to Romney's campaign

GOP-e should have thought about that before cheating/manipulating the primaries and serving a s**t sandwich named Willard to Conservatives, demanding that we eat and enjoy it. In a year where a true Conservative could have easily knocked off the The Kenyan Marxist, we get (apparently) the worst candidate possible. Surely the homos, "moderates", abortionists, gun-grabbers etc... and everyone else Willard has pandered to + the LDS enterprise will more than make-up for the loss of Conservative votes?
33 posted on 05/14/2012 11:53:48 AM PDT by kevcol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

Great post!


34 posted on 05/14/2012 11:55:22 AM PDT by libdestroyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: libdestroyer

You suck...


35 posted on 05/14/2012 12:03:38 PM PDT by goseminoles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Virgil Goode can't even find Massachusetts on a map let alone determine who was,and was *not*,responsible for homosexual “marriage” here.
36 posted on 05/14/2012 12:06:17 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Julia: another casualty of the "War on Poverty")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

Just to follow up on your excellent post, which I think the same about...

Histrionic, fear-driven posters are making this sound like the end of the world. That if each of us does not cast a vote for RINOmney, we are voting for Zero. This is as false as saying that each time we drink a 7up, we are actually drinking a coke. No sale.

In all likelihood, there only three options:

1. Zero wins in a landslide, like in ‘08. If so, your vote won’t count, no matter who you vote for.
2. RINOmney wins in a landslide, in which case, your vote won’t count.
3. It is a dead-heat tie - IN YOUR STATE - and only then will your vote decide your state.

Unfortunately, your vote will likely not decide the national election unless the Electoral count is a tie and you are the final state. My state has 6 million voters. The odds of my vote deciding the election are small, very small. My state likely won’t decide the Electoral College final count.

Sorry, I don’t buy the whole fear driven end times scenario. The problem isn’t Zero. The problem is that he is not opposed in Congress, scorned, sued, etc.

I am focused on electing conservatives in each office that has a conservative in the race.


37 posted on 05/14/2012 12:13:10 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion ("I'm comfortable with a Romney win." - Pres. Jimmy Carter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Goode is the only real conservative in the race.

Not true.

Tom Hoefling interviewed by Steph Watts, May 11, 2012

38 posted on 05/14/2012 12:22:31 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (We're not Republicans or Democrats. We're Americans. Visit SelfGovernment.US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

You know EV that in all fairness and full disclosure, when you post things like that, you should say, “I am Tom Hoefling, and I approved this message.”

You are Tom Hoefling, aren’t you?


39 posted on 05/14/2012 12:27:37 PM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode not Evil (the lesser of 2 evils is still evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

Indeed. I live in a solidly red state that Maobama cannot possibly win. Whether Barack ‘Herod’ Obama wins re-election or not, I can safely vote for Goode since Romney will win the electoral votes from my state. We have 50 different presidential elections not one. Thank God for the electoral college.


40 posted on 05/14/2012 12:31:42 PM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-198 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson